Rep. Joni Jenkins, D-Shively, delivered a new recommendation that alters Gov. Steve Beshear's casino proposal to reduce the number of proposed casinos to nine.
Of those nine, "no more than five may be established by horse racing tracks," according to the proposed constitutional amendment that Jenkins introduced at 1:40 p.m. to the casino gaming subcommittee that she co-chairs.
Beshear's proposal allowed for up to seven at tracks and 12 overall.
Jenkins pitched her plan to replace Beshear's proposed amendment and said she hoped to send her version to the elections and constitutional amendment committee when it takes up the issue Wednesday morning.
UPDATE 2:36 p.m.: The expanded gambling committee voted 8-4 with three lawmakers passing to send Jenkins' version of the proposed constitutional amendment to the House Elections and Constitutional Amendments committee. It was a largely ceremonial vote, considering the expanded gambling committee is an advisory committee, but Jenkins said the vote was important as a way to allow the groups' members to weigh in after two months of work.
Here's the list of how the committee members voted for the recommended plan:
Rep. Mike Cherry, D-Princeton
Rep. Tim Firkins, D-Louisville
Rep. Charlie Hoffman, D-Georgetown
Rep. Harry Moberly, D-Richmond
Rep. Darryl Owens, D-Louisville
Rep. John Will Stacy, D-West Liberty
Rep. Tommy Thompson, D-Owensboro
Rep. Joni Jenkins, D-Shively
Those voting NO:
Rep. Jamie Comer, R-Tompkinsville
Rep. David Osborne, R-Prospect
Rep. Sal Santoro, R-Florence
Rep. Arnold Simpson, D-Covington
Those passing:
Rep. Leslie Combs, D-Pikeville
Rep. Larry Clark, D-Louisville
Rep. Carl Rollins, D-Midway
Another key difference between Jenkins' version and the governor's plan is that this new one requires local governments to have a role in approving casinos at tracks. The governor's draft called for local governments to get involved only if the tracks choose not to have a casino on site. Then the local governments would have to approve another location.
Before the vote, the issue sparked a range of discussion among the expanded gaming committee.
"I think you killed casinos in Kentucky," said Rep. Larry Clark, D-Louisville. Specifically, Clark objected to allowing race tracks to get approval of the local government to place a casino somewhere other than the track but requiring communities to take a vote of citizens in order to approve free-standing casinos.
Clark said he suspected the horse industry -- specifically citing the Kentucky Equine Education Project and its chairman, former Gov. Brereton Jones -- as writing Beshear's initial proposal, which Clark said clearly favored tracks.
"I think it's pretty obvious," he said.
Meanwhile, other lawmakers said they wanted to keep the provision of allowing a local-option vote for communities.
"This is a very difficult bill for me to vote for period. But without local option ... I would have a great difficulty of voting for this bill, as I've told my constituents back home," Rep. Mike Cherry, D-Princeton said.
Rep. Carl Rollins, D-Midway, also questioned whether the wording of the amendment would cut out the tracks.
"My fear is that we would have nine free-standing casinos," he said.
Rep. Harry Moberly said that wouldn't necessarily be the case. "I don't know that you and I have the same view that there ought to be several small casinos. I'm more interested in destination casinos," he said.
"We need to create a high bar of investment and things people must do," he said.
- Ryan Alessi
Recent Comments